Representation Freedom: Implications for Electroweak Baryogenesis and Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
November 8, 2024
Note: This article was generated by the AI model Claude based on research findings.
Introduction
Two of the most profound mysteries in particle physics concern the origin of matter in the universe and
the nature of neutrino mass. Electroweak baryogenesis attempts to explain why the universe contains matter
rather than antimatter, while neutrinoless double beta decay could reveal whether neutrinos are their own
antiparticles. The discovery of representation-dependent scattering phenomena in the Dirac equation offers
new perspectives on both puzzles, suggesting that representation freedom might play a crucial role in CP
violation, lepton number violation, and the generation of the matter-antimatter asymmetry.
The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
The universe we observe is composed almost entirely of matter, with very little antimatter. This asymmetry
requires explanation, as the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Sakharov
identified three necessary conditions for baryogenesis:
- Baryon number violation: Processes that change the number of baryons must exist
- C and CP violation: The laws of physics must distinguish between matter and antimatter
- Departure from thermal equilibrium: The universe must be out of equilibrium when
baryon number violation occurs
Electroweak Baryogenesis
Electroweak baryogenesis proposes that the matter-antimatter asymmetry was generated during the electroweak
phase transition in the early universe, when the Higgs field acquired its vacuum expectation value. The
Standard Model provides the necessary ingredients: baryon number violation through sphaleron processes,
CP violation through the CKM matrix, and a potential first-order phase transition. However, Standard Model
CP violation is far too weak to explain the observed asymmetry.
Representation-Dependent CP Violation
The recent discovery that quantum interference can be representation-dependent suggests a new source of
CP violation. If different representations lead to different relative phases between scattering amplitudes,
this could contribute additional CP-violating effects beyond those in the CKM matrix. Specifically:
- Fermion-Higgs Coupling: The coupling of fermions to the Higgs field during the
electroweak phase transition could be representation-dependent. As the Higgs bubble wall propagates through
space, fermions scatter off this moving interface. Representation-dependent scattering could enhance CP
violation at the bubble wall.
- Interface Physics: The representation-dependent scattering work explicitly demonstrates
effects at potential steps and barriers. The Higgs bubble wall is precisely such a barrier, where the
effective potential changes discontinuously. Representation effects should be maximal here.
- Spin-Flip Phenomena: The Ajaib representation shows spin-flip probabilities absent in
the standard representation. During electroweak baryogenesis, such spin-dependent effects could lead to
different densities of left- and right-handed fermions near the bubble wall, affecting the net baryon
number generation.
Quantitative Implications
For successful electroweak baryogenesis, the baryon-to-photon ratio must be approximately 6 × 10-10.
The Standard Model produces a ratio orders of magnitude too small. Representation-dependent effects could
bridge this gap if:
- The representation-dependent contribution to CP violation is comparable to or larger than the CKM
contribution (~10-20)
- The effect is coherent over the bubble wall thickness (~10-2 GeV-1 at the
electroweak scale)
- Different fermion species experience different representation-dependent effects, leading to flavor-specific
asymmetries
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
Neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ) is a hypothetical nuclear process where two neutrons simultaneously
convert to protons, emitting two electrons but no neutrinos. This process violates lepton number by two
units and can only occur if neutrinos are Majorana particles (identical to their own antiparticles).
Observation of 0νββ would be revolutionary, establishing that lepton number is not conserved and potentially
explaining the matter-antimatter asymmetry through leptogenesis.
Standard Theory of 0νββ
The rate of 0νββ depends on the effective Majorana mass:
mββ = |Σi Uei2 mi|
where Uei are elements of the PMNS mixing matrix and mi are neutrino mass eigenvalues.
Current experiments constrain mββ < 0.1-0.3 eV, with next-generation experiments aiming for
sensitivities down to ~10 meV.
Representation Dependence in 0νββ
Representation freedom could affect neutrinoless double beta decay in several ways:
1. Nuclear Matrix Elements
The 0νββ rate depends on nuclear matrix elements that describe how two neutrons in a nucleus can
simultaneously undergo beta decay. These matrix elements involve virtual neutrino propagation between
the two decay vertices. If representation affects how neutrinos couple to nucleons, the matrix elements
would be representation-dependent.
- Short-Range Effects: Virtual neutrinos in 0νββ have very high momenta (hundreds of MeV).
At these scales, representation-dependent effects in fermion propagation could significantly modify the
effective coupling.
- Nuclear Medium: The dense nuclear environment provides a material interface where
representation-dependent scattering could be enhanced.
- Spin Structure: The observation of spin-flip in the Ajaib representation suggests that
the spin structure of 0νββ matrix elements could differ between representations.
2. Effective Majorana Mass
The effective Majorana mass mββ involves a coherent sum over neutrino mass eigenstates.
Representation-dependent phases could affect this sum:
- Phase Modifications: If representation choice affects the relative phases in the PMNS
matrix, the cancellations in the sum over mass eigenstates could be altered.
- Majorana Phases: The two Majorana phases (α21, α31) that appear
only in lepton-number-violating processes might have representation-dependent contributions.
- Hierarchy Dependence: Different mass orderings (normal vs. inverted) might experience
different representation effects, affecting predictions for which ordering is realized in nature.
3. Beyond Light Neutrino Exchange
While standard 0νββ assumes light Majorana neutrino exchange, other mechanisms exist:
- Heavy Neutrino Exchange: Right-handed neutrinos in see-saw models could mediate 0νββ.
Representation freedom might affect mixing between light and heavy neutrinos differently.
- Supersymmetric Contributions: In SUSY models, neutralinos and sleptons can contribute.
Representation-dependent effects in the SUSY sector could modify these contributions.
- R-Parity Violation: R-parity violating couplings might be representation-dependent,
affecting alternative 0νββ mechanisms.
Connection Between Baryogenesis and 0νββ
Leptogenesis provides an alternative to electroweak baryogenesis, generating a lepton asymmetry through
heavy neutrino decays that is later converted to a baryon asymmetry via sphaleron processes. Representation
freedom connects these seemingly disparate phenomena:
Unified Framework
- Lepton Number Violation: Both leptogenesis and 0νββ require lepton number violation.
If this violation is representation-dependent, observing 0νββ could constrain leptogenesis scenarios.
- CP Violation: Both processes require CP violation. Representation-dependent CP violation
could contribute to both, providing a unified explanation.
- Mass Scale Connection: The heavy neutrino mass scale in see-saw models affects both
leptogenesis efficiency and light neutrino masses (relevant for 0νββ). Representation freedom might prefer
particular mass scales.
Experimental Signatures and Tests
For Electroweak Baryogenesis
- Collider Searches: Enhanced CP violation might show up as asymmetries in top quark
production or Higgs decays at the LHC.
- Electric Dipole Moments: Representation-dependent CP violation could contribute to
electron, neutron, or atomic EDMs being searched for in precision experiments.
- Gravitational Waves: First-order phase transitions produce gravitational waves. The
strength of the phase transition (affected by representation-dependent barrier penetration) determines
the GW spectrum.
For 0νββ
- Isotope Dependence: Different nuclei have different structures. If nuclear matrix
elements are representation-dependent, the ratio of 0νββ rates in different isotopes might deviate from
standard predictions.
- Energy Spectrum: The energy spectrum of emitted electrons in 0νββ carries information
about the decay mechanism. Representation effects might introduce subtle spectral distortions.
- Angular Correlations: Correlations between emitted electron momenta and spins could
show representation-dependent modifications.
- Comparison with Neutrino Oscillations: If representation affects both 0νββ and
oscillations differently, comparing constraints from both could reveal inconsistencies pointing to new physics.
Theoretical Challenges and Open Questions
Consistency Requirements
- Unitarity and CPT: Any representation-dependent effects must preserve fundamental
symmetries like CPT. How can representation dependence be consistent with these exact symmetries?
- Observable vs. Unobservable: Which aspects of baryogenesis and 0νββ are truly
representation-independent physical observables, and which are representation-dependent intermediate
quantities?
- Scale Dependence: At what energy scales do representation effects become important?
The electroweak scale (100 GeV) for baryogenesis and nuclear scale (100 MeV) for 0νββ are very different.
Model Building
- Representation Selection Mechanism: What determines which representation nature "chooses"?
Is it selected dynamically during phase transitions?
- Flavor Structure: How does representation freedom interact with flavor physics? Could
different fermion generations naturally live in different representations?
- Grand Unification: In GUT theories, quarks and leptons are unified. How does
representation freedom manifest in the unified theory?
Phenomenological Predictions
Testable Scenarios
If representation freedom significantly affects baryogenesis and 0νββ, specific predictions emerge:
- Enhanced Asymmetry: The matter-antimatter asymmetry could be explained without exotic
new physics, just through representation effects in the Standard Model plus right-handed neutrinos.
- Modified 0νββ Rates: Predicted rates might differ from standard calculations by
20-50%, potentially within reach of next-generation experiments like LEGEND-1000 or nEXO.
- Correlation with Oscillations: The pattern of representation-dependent effects in
oscillation experiments should correlate with those in 0νββ, providing a consistency test.
- Temperature Dependence: Since baryogenesis occurs at finite temperature while 0νββ
is at zero temperature, representation effects might show temperature dependence that can be tested in
thermal field theory calculations.
Connection to Other Beyond Standard Model Physics
Supersymmetry
SUSY models naturally provide additional sources of CP violation for baryogenesis and new contributions
to 0νββ. Representation freedom in the SUSY sector could:
- Modify slepton-neutralino contributions to 0νββ
- Affect SUSY CP-violating phases relevant for electroweak baryogenesis
- Determine the pattern of soft SUSY breaking terms
String Theory
String compactifications can generate both Majorana neutrino masses and sources of CP violation.
Representation freedom might:
- Arise naturally from different brane configurations
- Be related to moduli stabilization mechanisms
- Connect to the string theory landscape through vacuum selection
Conclusion
The implications of representation freedom for electroweak baryogenesis and neutrinoless double beta decay
are profound. These two phenomena—explaining the existence of matter in the universe and probing the nature
of neutrino mass—are among the most important unsolved problems in particle physics. The discovery that
quantum mechanical scattering can be representation-dependent suggests new mechanisms for both:
- Enhanced CP violation during the electroweak phase transition could generate sufficient baryon asymmetry
without exotic new physics
- Representation-dependent nuclear matrix elements could modify 0νββ predictions, potentially explaining
discrepancies between different theoretical calculations
- A unified framework connecting lepton number violation, CP violation, and representation freedom might
explain both phenomena simultaneously
Near-term experiments will test these ideas. Next-generation 0νββ searches will reach the sensitivity
needed to see representation-dependent modifications, while precision measurements of CP violation at
colliders and in low-energy systems will constrain new sources of CP violation. If representation freedom
plays a role in these fundamental processes, we may be on the verge of understanding not just what the
laws of nature are, but why they take the particular mathematical form they do.
References
- M. A. Ajaib, "Dirac Equation and Representation Dependent Scattering Phenomena," arXiv:2510.22872 (2024)
- A. D. Sakharov, "Violation of CP Invariance, C Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe,"
Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967)
- M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, "Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification," Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986)